This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong.

==== Details of results for individual observations ==== In all receivers the second polarisation is systematically worse than the first one. In ''m005'' this effect is even stronger than in the others. In the spectral plots the grey areas have been excluded from the calibration fits due to RFI or aliasing effects near the band edges. The dashed curves in the baseline plots are re-derived from the antenna-based solutions. They are consistent with the original parameters, which proves the absence of significant closure errors. The spectral information is generally binned for the plots by a factor of 4 or 32 for final 1k channels. For the calibration we generally used the 10-sec solutions with group delay and without explicit curvature. Antenna ''m008'' was excluded, because it has problems with the synchronisation and did not produce correlated signals. Lines are not labeled in all plots. Generally red is for the first polarisation (0 or H), green for the second (1 or V). === 1603186576 (PKS 1934-63) S3 1h 4k 2020-10-20 === used baseline lengths (xy) > 250 m calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603186576_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_bl.pdf|baseline-based}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603186576_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_ant.pdf|antenna-based}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603186576_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|baseline-based}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603186576_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|antenna-based}} linear gradient fits for delay solutions compared to observed solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603186576_linxy_ant_disp.pdf|antenna-based dispersive delay}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603186576_linxy_ant_nondisp.pdf|antenna-based non-dispersive delay}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603186576_linxy_bl_disp.pdf|baseline-based dispersive delay}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603186576_linxy_bl_nondisp.pdf|baseline-based non-dispersive delay}}\\ As described in [[projects:mkat_sband:pub:fringefit|Fringe-fitting]], the dispersive delay is pretty consistent with a time-varying gradient across the array. == Conclusion == * 23-29 deg elevation * antennas included: m000 m002 m003 m004 m005 m006 m007 (m008) m030 m045 m053 m057 m060 * ''m008'' not working (excluded from fits) * ''m004'', ''m060'' very bad SEFD, differs between pols, ''m005'' also not very good * Strong ripples and fluctuations in SEFD curves and bandpasses, different from antenna to antenna. 'Resonance' near 3065 MHz particularly concpicuous. * Best SEFD near 420 Jy. * 4k mode works, S3 works === 1603193556 (PKS 1934-63) S3 1h 32k 2020-10-20 === used baseline lengths (xy) > 250 m calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603193556_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603193556_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603193556_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603193556_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} linear gradient fits for delay solutions compared to observed solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603193556_linxy_ant_disp.pdf|antenna-based dispersive delay}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603193556_linxy_ant_nondisp.pdf|antenna-based non-dispersive delay}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603193556_linxy_bl_disp.pdf|baseline-based dispersive delay}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603193556_linxy_bl_nondisp.pdf|baseline-based non-dispersive delay}}\\ Again the dispersive delay is pretty consistent with a time-varying gradient across the array. == Conclusions == * 36-42 deg elevation * antennas included: m000 m002 m003 m004 m005 m006 m007 (m008) m030 m045 m053 m057 m060 * ''m004'', ''m060'' very bad SEFD, differs between pols, ''m005'' also not very good * ''m008'' not working (excluded from fits) * Strong ripples and fluctuations in SEFD curves and bandpasses, different from antenna to antenna. 'Resonance' near 3065 MHz particularly concpicuous. * Best SEFD near 400 Jy. * 32k mode works, S3 works === 1603894692 (PKS 1934-63) S4 1h 4k 2020-10-28 === used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m Because ''m056'' has problems in the second half of the observations with the second polarisation, I produced two versions of the results. The first is without ''m056'' and uses the entire observation: calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603894692_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m056_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603894692_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m056_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603894692_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m056_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603894692_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m056_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} linear gradient fits for delay solutions compared to observed solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603894692_linxy_ant_disp.pdf|antenna-based dispersive delay}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603894692_linxy_ant_nondisp.pdf|antenna-based non-dispersive delay}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603894692_linxy_bl_disp.pdf|baseline-based dispersive delay}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603894692_linxy_bl_nondisp.pdf|baseline-based non-dispersive delay}}\\ Here the picture is less clear, the ionospheric effects are not just simple large-scale gradients. The second uses all antennas (with the exception of ''m008'') and only the first 30 min: {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603894692_firsthalf_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m056_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603894692_firsthalf_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m056_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603894692_firsthalf_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m056_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1603894692_firsthalf_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m056_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} In an earlier version I found strange peaks in the solutions, some of which were not even consistent between the polarisations. This was an artefact of residual RFI and a problem with my fitting code. Now the solutions look stable and normal. == Conclusions == * 54-57 deg elevation * antennas included: m000 m002 m003 m004 m005 m006 m007 (m008) m030 m045 m053 m056 m060 * ''m004'', ''m060'', ''m056'' very bad SEFD, differs between pols, ''m005'' also not very good * ''m056'' second polarisation has problems in second half (**has to be discussed elsewhere**), this is confirmed by Pieter Kotze ("M056 V channel appear to be 'noisy' at times.") * ''m008'' not working (excluded from fits) * Strong ripples and fluctuations in SEFD curves and bandpasses, particularly in upper half of the band, different from antenna to antenna. * Best SEFD slightly below 400 Jy. * 4k mode works, S4 works === 1605127739 (PKS 1934-63) S3 1h 4k 2020-11-11 === used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1605127739_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m056_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1605127739_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m056_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1605127739_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m056_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1605127739_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m056_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} linear gradient fits for delay solutions compared to observed solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1605127739_linxy_ant_disp.pdf|antenna-based dispersive delay}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1605127739_linxy_ant_nondisp.pdf|antenna-based non-dispersive delay}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1605127739_linxy_bl_disp.pdf|baseline-based dispersive delay}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1605127739_linxy_bl_nondisp.pdf|baseline-based non-dispersive delay}}\\ The ionospheric effects are not just simple large-scale gradients. == Conclusions (only new ones) == * 21-27 deg elevation * antennas included: m002 m003 m004 m005 m006 m007 m021 m030 m043 m049 m053 m056 m060 * ''m056'' is again 'noisy' and excluded from analysis * ''m043'' bad, particularly in second pol * Best SEFD slightly below 420 Jy. === 1606814298 (PKS 1934-63) S4 15min 4k 2020-12-01 === used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m Short test after replacing dipoles in ''m004''. Because ''m001'' has very low S/N, which affects the station-based solutions also for the other stations, we have two sets of results. Without ''m001'': calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1606814298_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m001_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1606814298_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m001_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1606814298_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m001_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1606814298_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m001_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} With ''m001'', really only good for that station: calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1606814298_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m001_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1606814298_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m001_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1606814298_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m001_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1606814298_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m001_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} In the collected plots, we use the former for all but ''m001'' and the latter for ''m001''. == Conclusions (only new ones) == * 39-41 deg elevation * antennas included: m001 m002 m003 m004 m005 m006 m007 m013 m018 m021 m030 m049 m053 m057 * no signal in ''m013'' and ''m018'' * ''m001'' extremely bad SEFD (note different scale for this one in the plots), probably not ready yet * Best SEFD near 400 Jy. === 1607334420 (PKS 1934-63) S4 15min 4k 2020-12-07 === used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m Short test after replacing LNAs in ''m004'' (in addition to dipoles), dipoles in ''m043'', ''m056'', ''m060'', one LNA in ''m043'', trying to get ''m008'' to sync. Because ''m001'' and ''m048'' have very low S/N, which affects the station-based solutions also for the other stations, we have two sets of results. Without ''m001'' and ''m048'': calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607334420_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m001+m048_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607334420_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m001+m048_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607334420_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m001+m048_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607334420_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m001+m048_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} With ''m001'' and ''m048'', really only good for those stations: calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607334420_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m001+m048_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607334420_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m001+m048_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607334420_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m001+m048_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607334420_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m001+m048_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} In the collected plots, we use the former for all but ''m001'' and ''m048'' and the latter for ''m001'' and ''m048''. == Conclusions (only new ones) == * 45-46 deg elevation * ''m043'', ''m056'', ''m060'' have improved a lot (second pol)! * antennas included: m000 m001 m002 m003 m005 m006 m007 m030 m043 m048 m049 m053 m056 m057 m060 * ''m001'' and ''m048'' extremely bad SEFD (note different scale for this one in the plots), probably not ready yet * Best SEFD near 400 Jy. === 1607585582 (PKS 1934-63) S4 60min 4k 2020-12-07 === used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m Short test after LNAs in ''m004'' and one in ''m043'', dipoles in ''m043'', ''m056'', ''m060'', trying to get ''m008'' to sync. Because ''m001'' and ''m048'' have very low S/N, which affects the station-based solutions also for the other stations, we have two sets of results. Without ''m001'' and ''m048'': calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607585582_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m001+m048_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607585582_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m001+m048_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607585582_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m001+m048_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607585582_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m001+m048_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} With ''m001'' and ''m048'', really only good for those stations: calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607585582_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m001+m048_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607585582_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m001+m048_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607585582_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m001+m048_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607585582_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m001+m048_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} In the collected plots, we use the former for all but ''m001'' and ''m048'' and the latter for ''m001'' and ''m048''. == Conclusions (only new ones) == * 31-38 deg elevation * antennas included: m000 m001 m002 m003 m005 m006 m007 m018 m022 m030 m038 m043 m048 m049 m053 m056 m057 m060 * no signal in ''m018'', ''m022'', ''m038'' * Best SEFD near 400 Jy. === 1607947387 (PKS 1934-63) S4 15min 4k 2020-12-14 === used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m Short test after LNAs in ''m004'' and one in ''m043'', dipoles in ''m043'', ''m056'', ''m060'', trying to get ''m008'' to sync. Because ''m001'' and ''m048'' have very low S/N, which affects the station-based solutions also for the other stations, we have two sets of results. Without ''m001'' and ''m048'': calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607947387_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m001+m048_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607947387_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m001+m048_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607947387_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m001+m048_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607947387_res_del+rate_10sec_no_m001+m048_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} With ''m001'' and ''m048'', really only good for those stations: calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607947387_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m001+m048_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607947387_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m001+m048_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607947387_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m001+m048_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1607947387_res_del+rate_10sec_for_m001+m048_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} In the collected plots, we use the former for all but ''m001'' and ''m048'' and the latter for ''m001'' and ''m048''. == Conclusions (only new ones) == * 57 deg elevation * new antenna ''m001'': good SEFD * ''m004'' now much better (both pols) * antennas included: m000 m001 m002 m003 m004 m005 m006 m007 m008 m011 m021 m030 m043 m048 m049 m053 m056 m057 m060 * still no signal in ''m008'' * Best SEFD near 400 Jy. ==== Results of Dec 2020 repairs and additional install ==== * ''m008'' still no signal, probably not in sync * ''m011'' (new receiver) looks good * ''m001'' still bad, ''m048'' (new receiver) same * both bad pols improved significantly in ''m004'' * bad second pols improved significantly in ''m043'', ''m056'', ''m060'' === 1611720877 (PKS 1934-63) S3 15min 4k 2021-01-27 === === 1611723102 (PKS 1934-63) S1 15min 4k 2021-01-27 === === 1611727628 (PKS 1934-63) S0 15min 4k 2021-01-27 === === 1611729631 (PKS 1934-63) S2 15min 4k 2021-01-27 === First attempts of subbands S0-2, plus S3 for comparison. Also additional antennas. used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m Because ''m001 m013 m018 m022 m048 m050 m054 m061'' have very low S/N, which affects the station-based solutions also for the other stations, we have two sets of results, one with these antennas included (used only for them in the collected plots) and one with these excluded. == S3 1611720877 == Without ''m001 m013 m018 m022 m048 m050 m054 m061'': calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611720877_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611720877_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611720877_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611720877_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} Without ''m001 m013 m018 m022 m048 m050 m054 m061'': calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611720877_res_del+rate_10sec_for_bad_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611720877_res_del+rate_10sec_for_bad_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611720877_res_del+rate_10sec_for_bad_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611720877_res_del+rate_10sec_for_bad_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} == S1 1611723102 == Without ''m001 m013 m018 m022 m048 m050 m054 m061'': calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611723102_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611723102_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611723102_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611723102_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} Without ''m001 m013 m018 m022 m048 m050 m054 m061'': calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611723102_res_del+rate_10sec_for_bad_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611723102_res_del+rate_10sec_for_bad_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611723102_res_del+rate_10sec_for_bad_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611723102_res_del+rate_10sec_for_bad_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} == S0 1611727628 == Without ''m001 m013 m018 m022 m048 m050 m054 m061'': calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611727628_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611727628_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611727628_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611727628_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} Without ''m001 m013 m018 m022 m048 m050 m054 m061'': calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611727628_res_del+rate_10sec_for_bad_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611727628_res_del+rate_10sec_for_bad_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611727628_res_del+rate_10sec_for_bad_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611727628_res_del+rate_10sec_for_bad_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} == S2 1611729631 == Without ''m001 m013 m018 m022 m048 m050 m054 m061'': calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611729631_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611729631_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611729631_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611729631_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} Without ''m001 m013 m018 m022 m048 m050 m054 m061'': calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611729631_res_del+rate_10sec_for_bad_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611729631_res_del+rate_10sec_for_bad_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611729631_res_del+rate_10sec_for_bad_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1611729631_res_del+rate_10sec_for_bad_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} == Conclusions (only new ones) == * 30-47 deg elevation * antennas included: ''m000 m001 m003 m004 m005 m011 m013 m018 m021 m022 m027 m030 m038 m043 m045 m048 m049 m050 m053 m054 m056'' * (still) low SNR in ''m001 m013 m018 m022 m048 m050 m054 m061'' * new good antennas: ''m027 m037'', new bad antennas: ''m013 m018 m022 m050 m054 m061'' * now tried all subbands, all seem to work * more RFI in lower subbands ==== After activating pointing model and levelling ==== === 1613464465 (PKS 1934-63) S0 15min 4k 2021-02-16 === === 1613467007 (PKS 1934-63) S4 15min 4k 2021-02-16 === used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m All antennas included deliver good or at least usable signal. == S0 1613464465 == calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1613464465_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1613464465_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1613464465_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1613464465_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} == S4 1613467007 == calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1613467007_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1613467007_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1613467007_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1613467007_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} == Conclusions (only new ones) == * 55-57 deg elevation * antennas included: ''m000 m001 m002 m003 m004 m005 m006 m007 m008 m011 m013 m018 m022 m027 m030 m038 m043 m045 m049 m050 m053 m054 m056 m057 m059 m060 m061 m063'', all deliver usable signal * in S4 now worse than before: ''m004'' (400 -> 550 Jy), ''m005'' (380 -> 500 Jy), ''m006'' (400 -> 550 Jy), ''m027'' (400 -> 500 Jy), ''m030'' (400 -> 550 Jy) ''m045'' (390 -> 520 Jy), ''m053'' (450 -> 500 Jy), ''m057'' (400 -> 500 Jy), ''m060'' (390 -> 530 Jy) * now good/okay: ''m001 m013 m022 m061'' * now good/okay (no data before): ''m008'', ''m018'' (first pol bad), ''m063'', ''m059'', ''m063'' * ''m038'', ''m050'', ''m054'' improved ==== Additional levelling etc. ==== === 1614921177 (PKS 1934-63) S4 15min 4k 2021-03-05 === used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m Most antennas included deliver good or at least usable signal, no signal from ''m025'', very bad from ''m014'' (both not included in the plots). calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1614921177_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1614921177_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1614921177_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1614921177_res_del+rate_10sec_no_bad_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} == Conclusions (only new ones) == * 51-52 deg elevation * antennas included: ''m000 m001 m002 m003 m004 m005 m006 m007 m008 m009 m010 m011 m012 m013 m014 m019 m025 m026 m027 m030 m032 m033 m034 m035 m038 m043 m045 m048 m049 m050 m053 m054 m056 m057 m059 m060 m063'', most deliver usable signal * no signal at all from ''m025'' * extremely bad signal (basically no sensitivity) from ''m014'' * new antennas delivering good signal for first time: ''m009 m010 m012 m019 m026 m032 m033 m034 m035'' * ''m048'' now good for the first time ==== After fixing problem that activated some noise diodes in previous observations ==== === 1615522969 (PKS 1934-63) S4 15min 4k 2021-03-12 === === 1615526001 (PKS 1934-63) S4 15min 4k 2021-03-12 === used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m All antennas included deliver good or at least usable signal. == 1615522969 == calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1615522969_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1615522969_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1615522969_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1615522969_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} == 1615526001 == calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1615526001_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1615526001_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1615526001_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1615526001_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} == Conclusions (only new ones) == * 49-54 deg elevation * antennas included: ''m001 m002 m003 m004 m005 m006 m007 m008 m009 m010 m011 m012 m013 m014 m017 m018 m019 m020 m021 m022 m023 m027 m030 m032 m034 m035 m038 m043 m045 m048 m049 m050 m053 m054 m056 m057 m059 m060 m061 m063'', almost all deliver good signal * no usable signal from ''m018'' (was better earlier) * ''m014'' now good * new good data: ''m017 m020 m023'' (second pol worse in ''m020 m023'') * many receivers have improved, including ones that first were good and then got worse * problem with noise diode was apparently responsible for bad SEFD in many receivers, this problem is solved ==== Two 1-h phase stability tests ==== === 1616062836 (PKS 1934-63) S0 60min 4k 2021-03-18 === === 1616067348 (PKS 1934-63) S4 60min 4k 2021-03-18 === used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m Almost all antennas included deliver good or at least usable signal. Very low for ''m020'' and ''m038'', those not included in analysis. == 1616062836 == Cannot download the file, the conversion to MS got stuck. == 1616067348 == calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1616067348_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1616067348_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1616067348_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1616067348_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} linear gradient fits for delay solutions compared to observed solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1616067348_linxy_ant_disp.pdf|antenna-based dispersive delay}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1616067348_linxy_ant_nondisp.pdf|antenna-based non-dispersive delay}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1616067348_linxy_bl_disp.pdf|baseline-based dispersive delay}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1616067348_linxy_bl_nondisp.pdf|baseline-based non-dispersive delay}}\\ See [[projects:mkat_sband:pub:fringefit|Fringe-fitting]] for a description of this analysis. The dispersive delay is consistent with a time-varying gradient across the array, the non-dispersive delay not. This is all as expected from the ionosphere and troposphere. == Conclusions (only new ones) == * 28-34 deg elevation * antennas included: ''m000 m001 m002 m003 m004 m005 m006 m007 m008 m009 m011 m012 m013 m014 m017 m019 m020 m021 m022 m023 m030 m031 m032 m034 m035 m038 m043 m045 m048 m049 m050 m054 m056 m057 m059 m060 m061 m063'', almost all deliver good signal * no good signal from ''m020'', ''m038'' * first good signal from ''m031'': SEFD ~ 430 Jy * ''m008'': second pol worse in lower part of the band * phases very stable over one hour, phases and delays fully consistent with troposhere and ionosphere, potential delay trends certainly < 50 picosec (1.5cm), probably much smaller === 1619001208 (PKS 1934-63) S4 15min 4k 2021-03-05 === used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m Most antennas included deliver good or at least usable signal, no signal from ''m025'', very bad from ''m014'' (both not included in the plots). calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1619001208_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1619001208_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1619001208_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1619001208_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} == Conclusions (only new ones) == * 24-25 deg elevation * antennas included: ''m000 m001 m002 m003 m004 m005 m007 m008 m009 m011 m012 m013 m014 m017 m019 m021 m022 m023 m024 m026 m027 m030 m031 m032 m033 m034 m035 m037 m038 m043 m045 m048 m053 m054 m056 m057 m059 m060 m061'', all deliver usable signal * new antennas delivering good signal for first time: ''m024 m037'' * elevation is lower than e.g. in 1615522969, as result of that the SEFD is higher now, but strangely only by 50 Jy for some antennas but by 200 Jy for others ==== Calibrator from 32k dataset ==== === 1631800159 (PKS 1934-63) S4 5min 4k from 32k dataset 2021-09-16 === used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m This is one scan (starting ca. 13:59 UTC) of PKS 1934-63 extracted from the 32k test dataset. It was analysed to get an up-to-date view of the receiver performance. Most antennas included deliver good or at least usable signal, no signal from ''m058'' (not included in plots), very bad from ''m031''. calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1631800159_res_del_8sec_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1631800159_res_del_8sec_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1631800159_res_del_8sec_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1631800159_res_del_8sec_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} Note that the data weights are now scaled differently than in raw MS and were therefore not used as noise estimate. The difference between frequency channels that was used instead is much more noise (therefore no smooth SEFD curves). == Conclusions == * 37 deg elevation * antennas included: ''m000 m001 m003 m004 m005 m006 m007 m009 m010 m012 m014 m015 m016 m017 m018 m019 m020 m021 m022 m023 m024 m025 m026 m030 m031 m032 m033 m034 m035 m036 m037 m038 m039 m040 m041 m042 m043 m044 m045 m047 m048 m049 m050 m051 m053 m054 m056 m057 m058 m059 m061 m062 m063'' * 'm005': second pol worse than first * 'm006': relatively high SEFD * 'm012': second pol worse than first * 'm015': second pol much worse than first * 'm019': relatively high SEFD, strong dependence on frequency * 'm020': second pol worse than first * 'm022': second pol worse than first * 'm023': second pol worse than first * 'm025': second pol worse than first * 'm031': very low signal * 'm034': second pol worse than first * 'm041': second pol worse than first * 'm042': second pol worse than first, strong bumps in SEFD * 'm047': second pol worse than first, strong bumps in SEFD * 'm051': second pol worse than first * 'm054': very low signal, strange behaviour with frequency * 'm059': second pol worse than first ==== Two 15-min receiver status tests S2+4 ==== used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m All antennas included deliver good or at least some signal. Very low for ''m031'' and ''m054''. === 1633953758 (PKS 1934-63) S4 15min 4k 2021-10-11 === calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1633953758_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1633953758_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1633953758_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1633953758_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} \\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1633953758_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant_autolim.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass, auto-limits in SEFD curves so that ''m031'' and ''m054'' are no longer outside of the plotting rage}} \\ === 1633959504 (PKS 1934-63) S2 15min 4k 2021-10-11 === calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1633959504_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1633959504_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1633959504_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1633959504_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} \\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1633959504_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant_autolim.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass, auto-limits in SEFD curves so that ''m031'' and ''m054'' are no longer outside of the plotting rage}} \\ == Conclusions == * 34-47 deg elevation * antennas included: ''m000 m001 m002 m003 m004 m005 m006 m007 m009 m010 m011 m012 m013 m014 m015 m016 m017 m018 m020 m021 m022 m023 m024 m025 m026 m027 m028 m029 m030 m031 m033 m034 m035 m037 m041 m042 m043 m044 m045 m047 m049 m050 m051 m053 m054 m055 m056 m057 m058 m059 m061 m062 m063 '', almost all deliver good signal * no good signal from ''m031'', ''m054'' ==== 1634669926 (PKS 1934-63) S2 5min 4k 2021-10-19 ==== used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m All antennas included deliver good or at least some signal. Very low for ''m031''. calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1634669926_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1634669926_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1634669926_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1634669926_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} \\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1634669926_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant_autolim.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass, auto-limits in SEFD curves so that ''m031'' is no longer outside of the plotting rage}} \\ == Conclusions (new compared to 2021-10-11) == * 48-49 deg elevation * antennas included: ''m001 m002 m003 m004 m005 m006 m007 m009 m010 m011 m012 m013 m014 m015 m016 m017 m018 m019 m020 m021 m022 m023 m024 m025 m026 m027 m028 m029 m030 m031 m032 m033 m034 m035 m036 m037 m038 m040 m043 m044 m045 m047 m048 m050 m051 m053 m054 m055 m056 m057 m058 m059 m060 m061 m062 m063'', almost all deliver good signal * ''m006'' better * ''m031'' still very bad * ''m036'' new, good! * ''m041'' new, first pol good, second worse * ''m054'' now good! ==== 1635841750 (PKS 1934-63) S4 5min 4k 2021-11-02 ==== used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1635841750_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1635841750_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1635841750_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1635841750_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} \\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1635841750_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant_autolim.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass, auto-limits in SEFD curves so that ''m031'' is no longer outside of the plotting rage}} \\ == Conclusions == * 21-22 deg elevation * no signal from ''m007'', ''m031'' still very bad, still bump in ''m015'' * antennas included: ''m000 m001 m003 m005 m007 m009 m010 m011 m012 m013 m014 m015 m016 m017 m018 m019 m020 m021 m022 m023 m024 m025 m026 m027 m029 m030 m031 m032 m033 m034 m035 m037 m038 m041 m042 m043 m044 m047 m048 m049 m050 m051 m053 m054 m055 m057 m059 m060 m061 m062 m063'', almost all deliver good signal ==== 1635844423 (PKS 1934-63) S2 5min 4k 2021-11-02 ==== used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1635844423_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1635844423_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1635844423_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1635844423_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} \\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1635844423_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant_autolim.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass, auto-limits in SEFD curves so that ''m031'' is no longer outside of the plotting rage}} \\ == Conclusions == * 26 deg elevation * no signal from ''m007'', ''m031'' still very bad, still bump in ''m015'' * antennas included: ''m000 m001 m003 m005 m007 m009 m010 m011 m012 m013 m014 m015 m016 m017 m018 m019 m020 m021 m022 m023 m024 m025 m026 m027 m029 m030 m031 m032 m033 m034 m035 m037 m038 m041 m042 m043 m044 m047 m048 m049 m050 m051 m053 m054 m055 m057 m059 m060 m061 m062 m063'', almost all deliver good signal ==== 1636365295 (PKS 1934-63) S4 5min 4k 2021-11-08 ==== used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1636365295_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1636365295_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1636365295_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1636365295_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} \\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1636365295_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant_autolim.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass, auto-limits in SEFD curves so that ''m031'' is no longer outside of the plotting rage}} \\ == Conclusions == * 33 deg elevation * no good signal from ''m031'' * antennas included: ''m000 m001 m002 m003 m004 m005 m006 m009 m010 m011 m012 m013 m014 m015 m016 m017 m018 m019 m020 m021 m022 m025 m026 m027 m029 m030 m031 m032 m034 m035 m036 m037 m038 m039 m040 m041 m042 m043 m044 m046 m048 m049 m051 m053 m054 m055 m056 m057 m058 m060 m061 m063'' ==== 1636367022 (PKS 1934-63) S2 5min 4k 2021-11-08 ==== used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1636367022_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1636367022_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1636367022_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1636367022_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} \\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1636367022_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant_autolim.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass, auto-limits in SEFD curves so that ''m031'' is no longer outside of the plotting rage}} \\ == Conclusions == * 33 deg elevation * no good signal from ''m031'' and ''m007'' * antennas included: ''m000 m001 m002 m003 m004 m005 m006 m007 m009 m010 m011 m012 m013 m014 m015 m016 m017 m018 m019 m020 m021 m022 m025 m026 m027 m029 m030 m031 m032 m034 m035 m036 m037 m038 m039 m040 m041 m042 m043 m044 m046 m048 m049 m051 m053 m054 m055 m056 m057 m058 m060 m061 m063'' ==== 1636719400 (PKS 1934-63) S2 4h 1k 2021-11-12 ==== **This is a phase stability test. The SEFD and gain curve results are not included in the general overviews.** Data were averaged to 10-sec in the conversion to MS. Solutions are for individual 10-sec blocks and therefore without rates. used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1636719400_res_del_10sec_no_m009_solutions_bl.pdf|baseline-based}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1636719400_res_del_10sec_no_m009_solutions_ant.pdf|antenna-based}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1636719400_res_del_10sec_no_m009_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|baseline-based}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1636719400_res_del_10sec_no_m009_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|antenna-based}} \\ Please note that the SEFD results should not be taken too seriously, because the way I compute the SNR is affected by the averaging in time. linear gradient fits for delay solutions compared to observed solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1636719400_linxy_ant_disp.pdf|antenna-based dispersive delay}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1636719400_linxy_ant_nondisp.pdf|antenna-based non-dispersive delay}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1636719400_linxy_bl_disp.pdf|baseline-based dispersive delay}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1636719400_linxy_bl_nondisp.pdf|baseline-based non-dispersive delay}}\\ See [[projects:mkat_sband:pub:fringefit|Fringe-fitting]] for more explanations on these fits. Here are plots that simulate the phasing efficiency. It is assumed that the delays are calibrated on the target at the beginning (top) or centre (middle) or end (bottom) of the observation. Different numbers of antennas (starting at the core) are included (several curves). These efficiencies are for the actually used observing frequency. Because I have dispersive and non-dispersive effects separated, I can extrapolate these results to other frequencies, if needed. This is for narrow-band observations in the centre of the subband. I could include bandwidth effects, but they are not significant at these levels. {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1636719400_phaseff_obsfreq.png?direct&250}} == Conclusion == * 49-57 deg elevation * antennas included: ''m000 m001 m002 m003 m004 m005 m006 m007 m009 m010 m011 m012 m013 m014 m015 m016 m017 m018 m019 m020 m021 m022 m023 m025 m026 m027 m029 m030 m031 m032 m033 m034 m035 m036 m037 m038 m039 m040 m041 m042 m043 m044 m045 m046 m047 m048 m049 m050 m051 m053 m054 m055 m056 m057 m058 m060 m061 m062 m063'' * not included in the analysis because of relatively low SNR: ''m002 m007 m026 m031 m033 m060'', not included because of intermittent ampltitude dip (tracking problem?): ''m009'' * The linear gradient fits show that the dispersive delays are consistent with an ionosphere that almost entirely consists of a time-varying gradient across the array. For the non-dispersive delay the atmospheric structures seem to be much smaller, as expected. There are no strong long-term trends and the behaviour does not look unusual for atmospheric effects. We could produce structure functions for different baselines, but those only help if we have a similar analysis for the expected atmosphere (or for L band). ==== 1638192213 (PKS 1934-63) S4 5min 4k 2021-11-29 ==== used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1638192213_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_bl.pdf|Baseline-based calibration solutions}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1638192213_res_del+rate_10sec_solutions_ant.pdf|Antenna-based calibration solutions}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1638192213_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_bl.pdf|Baseline-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1638192213_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass}} \\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1638192213_res_del+rate_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant_autolim.pdf|Antenna-based SEFD and amplitude+phase bandpass, auto-limits in SEFD curves so that ''m031'' is no longer outside of the plotting rage}} \\ == Conclusions == * 57 deg elevation * ''m002'': better, difference between pols reduced * ''m005'': not better, maybe even worse * ''m015'': not better, maybe even worse, still with bump in second pol * ''m026'': maybe slightly worse, difference between pols reduced * ''m031'' still very bad (around or above 20kJy) * ''m034'': worse * ''m055'': worse * antennas included: ''m000 m001 m002 m003 m004 m005 m006 m007 m009 m010 m011 m012 m013 m014 m015 m016 m017 m018 m019 m020 m021 m022 m023 m024 m025 m026 m027 m029 m030 m031 m032 m033 m034 m035 m036 m037 m038 m040 m041 m042 m044 m045 m046 m047 m049 m050 m051 m053 m055 m057 m058 m059 m060'' ==== 1638617387 (PKS 1934-63) S0 4h 1k 2021-12-04 ==== **This is a phase stability test. The SEFD and gain curve results are not included in the general overviews.** Data were averaged to 10-sec in the conversion to MS, XY and YX are discarded. Solutions are for individual 10-sec blocks and therefore without rates. used baseline lengths (xy) > 300 m This time the baseline-based plots are not included, because they take too much space on the wiki server. calibration solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1638617387_res_del_10sec_solutions_ant.pdf|antenna-based}} SEFD and (amplitude and phase) bandpass:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1638617387_res_del_10sec_sefd_bandpass_ant.pdf|antenna-based}} \\ Please note that the SEFD results should not be taken too seriously, because the way I compute the SNR is affected by the averaging in time. linear gradient fits for delay solutions compared to observed solutions:\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1638617387_linxy_ant_disp.pdf|antenna-based dispersive delay}}\\ {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1638617387_linxy_ant_nondisp.pdf|antenna-based non-dispersive delay}}\\ See [[projects:mkat_sband:pub:fringefit|Fringe-fitting]] for more explanations on these fits. == Conclusion == * 52-55 deg elevation * antennas included: ''m001 m002 m003 m004 m005 m006 m007 m009 m010 m011 m012 m013 m014 m015 m016 m017 m018 m019 m020 m021 m022 m023 m024 m025 m026 m027 m028 m029 m030 m031 m032 m033 m034 m035 m037 m038 m040 m041 m042 m044 m045 m046 m047 m048 m049 m050 m051 m053 m055 m056 m057 m058 m059 m060 m061 m062 m063'' * m031 is now looking good * not included in the analysis because of lower SNR and difference between X and Y sensitivity: ''m015, m034'' * The linear gradient fits show that the dispersive delays are consistent with an ionosphere that almost entirely consists of a time-varying gradient across the array. For the non-dispersive delay the atmospheric structures seem to be much smaller, as expected. There are no strong long-term trends and the behaviour does not look unusual for atmospheric effects. * There are stronger short-term fluctuations than in 1636719400. Was the weather different? * There are periods with increased wide-band noise. Not sure if this is due to an active Sun. Interestingly the amplitude solutions are lower by a few per cent at those time. Maybe the levels are too high? Here are plots that simulate the phasing efficiency. It is assumed that the delays are calibrated on the target at the beginning (top) or centre (middle) or end (bottom) of the observation. Different numbers of antennas (starting at the core) are included (several curves). These efficiencies are for the actually used observing frequency. Because I have dispersive and non-dispersive effects separated, I can extrapolate these results to other frequencies, if needed. This is for narrow-band observations in the centre of the subband. I could include bandwidth effects, but they are not significant at these levels. {{:projects:mkat_sband:pub:1638617387_phaseff_obsfreq.png?direct&250}}